Caveat against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi filed in Supreme Court

-


Caveat against Rahul Gandhi

A caveat is filed in the Supreme Court by the complainant, Purnesh Modi, in anticipation of an appeal against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court refusing to stay Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s conviction in a defamation case. The caveat is a legal notice filed by a party informing that the opposite party may file a case against them. On July 7, the day when Gujarat HC gave a decision in the defamation case where Rahul Gandhi made a remark on the ‘Modi’ surname, a caveat was filed by the complainant. Earlier in March 2023, Rahul Gandhi was found guilty of defamation remarks made by him during 2019 election campaigns.

Click Here To Read Full News

Also Read: Supreme Court Latest Updates, Legal Articles, Legal News

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bilkis Bano Case: Supreme Court to hear petitions against remission of 11 convicts on August 7

-
Image
  The Supreme Court fixed the hearing of petitions filed by  Bilkis Bano  and others related to the  2002 Gujarat riots  on August 7, 2023. The petitions were against the remission granted to all 11 convicts for the crime of gang-raping Bilkis Bano and killing her family members. The matter will be heard by the bench headed by  Justice BV Nagarathna . While hearing the matter today, Justice Nagarathna and  Justice Ujjal Bhuyan  pronounced, “The counsel for Bilkis Bano submitted that newspaper publication as directed by this court was effected on June 1, 2023, and an affidavit with that regard was filed on June 7. Similarly, in other cases, notices on the respondent are stated to be served either directly or by newspaper publication. This fact is not disputed by Solicitor-general for India  Tushar Mehta  appearing for both the Union of India and the  State of Gujarat , as well as other counsel appearing for the private respondents. Therefore, the service on all respondents is held to be
Read more

Kidnapping and Abduction: Key Differences

-
Image
  Introduction Kidnapping and abduction are two terms often used interchangeably to describe the act of taking someone against their will. In this comprehensive article, we aim to provide answers to the fundamental questions, like, What exactly is kidnapping, and how does it differ from abduction? What are the various types and forms that these actions can take? By exploring the definitions, types, and forms of both kidnapping and abduction, we’ll uncover their key differences, offering you a complete understanding of these critical concepts. Kidnapping and Abduction Kidnapping Kidnapping refers to the act of unlawfully seizing and detaining an individual against their will, often with the intent to demand a ransom or exert control over the victim for various reasons. It typically involves the use of force, threat, or deception to capture the victim. Kidnapping is a criminal offence in most jurisdictions and is universally condemned due to its grave impact on the victim’s physical and
Read more
-
  Separation of Powers in India The separation of powers divides the government machinery into three branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary. This not only prevents power concentration, but also creates a system of checks and balances. Based on the organizational system of the constitution, the separation of powers doctrine ensures that each power has different authorities and responsibilities. Furthermore, the Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances to ensure that no power exercises supremacy over others or abuses the powers bestowed upon it. If there is an invasion or power struggle between them, each branch regulates the other, preventing a concentration of power in one. Benefits: The system of separation of powers has the following advantages: It promotes liberty by preventing the consolidation of power in a single authority. It increases efficiency. Facilitates and enriches democratic debate by utilizing everyone's balance sheet forces. Jud
Read more